The market makes HK Dukla Trencin the favourite at 57.9% implied probability, with Bet7k paying 1.61 — the best price of the 3 bookmakers we compare.
These are market prices, not a tip — the decision is yours.
Best available odds
What the odds imply: HK Dukla Trencin 57.9%, HC 19 Humenne 42.1%. Implied probability from the consensus of 3 bookmakers, with the 7.6% margin removed.
Bet7k offers the best price on HK Dukla Trencin to win: 1.61
Bet7k offers the best price on HC 19 Humenne to win: 2.21
The gap between the best and worst price on HK Dukla Trencin is 0.6% — R$100 returns R$161 at Bet7k but only R$160 at Bet365.
Comparing live odds across 3 bookmakers, updated continuously.
Frequently asked questions
Which bookmaker has the best odds for HK Dukla Trencin vs HC 19 Humenne?
Bet7k currently offers the best price on HK Dukla Trencin to win at 1.61. LaserOdds compares 3 bookmakers in real time so you always see the top available price for each outcome.
What is the win probability for HK Dukla Trencin vs HC 19 Humenne?
Across 3 bookmakers the odds imply 57.9% for HK Dukla Trencin and 42.1% for HC 19 Humenne. These are probabilities implied by the prices, with the 7.6% bookmaker margin removed — not a prediction.
When do HK Dukla Trencin and HC 19 Humenne kick off?
HK Dukla Trencin vs HC 19 Humenne starts on 28 Aug 2026, 13:00 (UTC), in the Club Friendlies.
How many bookmakers does LaserOdds compare for this match?
LaserOdds compares odds from 3 bookmakers for HK Dukla Trencin vs HC 19 Humenne, highlighting the best price for each outcome.
How much does the choice of bookmaker change the payout on HK Dukla Trencin vs HC 19 Humenne?
On HK Dukla Trencin, prices across 3 bookmakers run from 1.60 to 1.61. A R$100 stake returns R$161 at Bet7k against R$160 at Bet365 — a 0.6% difference for the same bet.
Where can I bet on HK Dukla Trencin vs HC 19 Humenne?
You can compare odds from 3 licensed bookmakers for HK Dukla Trencin vs HC 19 Humenne on LaserOdds and follow the link to your preferred operator. Please gamble responsibly.