The market makes Vales, Amit the favourite at 70.8% implied probability, with Bet365 paying 1.36 — the best price of the 3 bookmakers we compare.
These are market prices, not a tip — the decision is yours.
Best available odds
What the odds imply: Scaglia, Mathieu 29.2%, Vales, Amit 70.8%. Implied probability from the consensus of 3 bookmakers, with the 8.0% margin removed.
Ladbrokes offers the best price on Scaglia, Mathieu to win: 3.50
Bet365 offers the best price on Vales, Amit to win: 1.36
The gap between the best and worst price on Scaglia, Mathieu is 16.7% — €100 returns €350 at Ladbrokes but only €300 at Bet365.
Comparing live odds across 3 bookmakers, updated continuously.
Frequently asked questions
Which bookmaker has the best odds for Scaglia, Mathieu vs Vales, Amit?
Ladbrokes currently offers the best price on Scaglia, Mathieu to win at 3.50. LaserOdds compares 3 bookmakers in real time so you always see the top available price for each outcome.
What is the win probability for Scaglia, Mathieu vs Vales, Amit?
Across 3 bookmakers the odds imply 29.2% for Scaglia, Mathieu and 70.8% for Vales, Amit. These are probabilities implied by the prices, with the 8.0% bookmaker margin removed — not a prediction.
When do Scaglia, Mathieu and Vales, Amit kick off?
Scaglia, Mathieu vs Vales, Amit starts on 6 Sept 2026, 10:20 (UTC), in the Challenger Cassis, France.
How many bookmakers does LaserOdds compare for this match?
LaserOdds compares odds from 3 bookmakers for Scaglia, Mathieu vs Vales, Amit, highlighting the best price for each outcome.
How much does the choice of bookmaker change the payout on Scaglia, Mathieu vs Vales, Amit?
On Scaglia, Mathieu, prices across 3 bookmakers run from 3.00 to 3.50. A €100 stake returns €350 at Ladbrokes against €300 at Bet365 — a 16.7% difference for the same bet.
Where can I bet on Scaglia, Mathieu vs Vales, Amit?
You can compare odds from 3 licensed bookmakers for Scaglia, Mathieu vs Vales, Amit on LaserOdds and follow the link to your preferred operator. Please gamble responsibly.