The market makes Broom, Charles the favourite at 65.2% implied probability, with Unibet paying 1.45 — the best price of the 4 bookmakers we compare.
These are market prices, not a tip — the decision is yours.
Best available odds
What the odds imply: Broom, Charles 65.2%, Erhard, Mathys 34.8%. Implied probability from the consensus of 4 bookmakers, with the 8.6% margin removed.
Unibet offers the best price on Broom, Charles to win: 1.45
Paddy Power offers the best price on Erhard, Mathys to win: 2.80
The gap between the best and worst price on Broom, Charles is 6.3% — €100 returns €145 at Unibet but only €136 at QuinnBet.
Comparing live odds across 4 bookmakers, updated continuously.
Frequently asked questions
Which bookmaker has the best odds for Broom, Charles vs Erhard, Mathys?
Unibet currently offers the best price on Broom, Charles to win at 1.45. LaserOdds compares 4 bookmakers in real time so you always see the top available price for each outcome.
What is the win probability for Broom, Charles vs Erhard, Mathys?
Across 4 bookmakers the odds imply 65.2% for Broom, Charles and 34.8% for Erhard, Mathys. These are probabilities implied by the prices, with the 8.6% bookmaker margin removed — not a prediction.
When do Broom, Charles and Erhard, Mathys kick off?
Broom, Charles vs Erhard, Mathys starts on 1 Sept 2026, 08:00 (UTC), in the Challenger Manacor, Spain.
How many bookmakers does LaserOdds compare for this match?
LaserOdds compares odds from 4 bookmakers for Broom, Charles vs Erhard, Mathys, highlighting the best price for each outcome.
How much does the choice of bookmaker change the payout on Broom, Charles vs Erhard, Mathys?
On Broom, Charles, prices across 4 bookmakers run from 1.36 to 1.45. A €100 stake returns €145 at Unibet against €136 at QuinnBet — a 6.3% difference for the same bet.
Where can I bet on Broom, Charles vs Erhard, Mathys?
You can compare odds from 4 licensed bookmakers for Broom, Charles vs Erhard, Mathys on LaserOdds and follow the link to your preferred operator. Please gamble responsibly.