The market makes Matusevich, Anton the favourite at 70.3% implied probability, with Betano BR paying 1.35 — the best price of the 8 bookmakers we compare.
These are market prices, not a tip — the decision is yours.
Best available odds
What the odds imply: Matusevich, Anton 70.3%, Ceban, Mark 29.7%. Implied probability from the consensus of 8 bookmakers, with the 7.3% margin removed.
Betano BR offers the best price on Matusevich, Anton to win: 1.35
Bet365 offers the best price on Ceban, Mark to win: 3.25
The gap between the best and worst price on Matusevich, Anton is 3.8% — R$100 returns R$135 at Betano BR but only R$130 at Bet7k.
Comparing live odds across 8 bookmakers, updated continuously.
Frequently asked questions
Which bookmaker has the best odds for Matusevich, Anton vs Ceban, Mark?
Betano BR currently offers the best price on Matusevich, Anton to win at 1.35. LaserOdds compares 8 bookmakers in real time so you always see the top available price for each outcome.
What is the win probability for Matusevich, Anton vs Ceban, Mark?
Across 8 bookmakers the odds imply 70.3% for Matusevich, Anton and 29.7% for Ceban, Mark. These are probabilities implied by the prices, with the 7.3% bookmaker margin removed — not a prediction.
When do Matusevich, Anton and Ceban, Mark kick off?
Matusevich, Anton vs Ceban, Mark starts on 20 Aug 2026, 11:30 (UTC), in the Challenger Roehampton, Great Britain.
How many bookmakers does LaserOdds compare for this match?
LaserOdds compares odds from 8 bookmakers for Matusevich, Anton vs Ceban, Mark, highlighting the best price for each outcome.
How much does the choice of bookmaker change the payout on Matusevich, Anton vs Ceban, Mark?
On Matusevich, Anton, prices across 8 bookmakers run from 1.30 to 1.35. A R$100 stake returns R$135 at Betano BR against R$130 at Bet7k — a 3.8% difference for the same bet.
Where can I bet on Matusevich, Anton vs Ceban, Mark?
You can compare odds from 8 licensed bookmakers for Matusevich, Anton vs Ceban, Mark on LaserOdds and follow the link to your preferred operator. Please gamble responsibly.