The market makes Jones, Emerson the favourite at 65.1% implied probability, with Bet365 paying 1.44 — the best price of the 8 bookmakers we compare.
These are market prices, not a tip — the decision is yours.
Best available odds
What the odds imply: Lamens, Suzan 34.9%, Jones, Emerson 65.1%. Implied probability from the consensus of 8 bookmakers, with the 8.0% margin removed.
Betano BR offers the best price on Lamens, Suzan to win: 2.77
Bet365 offers the best price on Jones, Emerson to win: 1.44
The gap between the best and worst price on Lamens, Suzan is 9.9% — R$100 returns R$277 at Betano BR but only R$252 at Superbet.
Comparing live odds across 8 bookmakers, updated continuously.
Frequently asked questions
Which bookmaker has the best odds for Lamens, Suzan vs Jones, Emerson?
Betano BR currently offers the best price on Lamens, Suzan to win at 2.77. LaserOdds compares 8 bookmakers in real time so you always see the top available price for each outcome.
What is the win probability for Lamens, Suzan vs Jones, Emerson?
Across 8 bookmakers the odds imply 34.9% for Lamens, Suzan and 65.1% for Jones, Emerson. These are probabilities implied by the prices, with the 8.0% bookmaker margin removed — not a prediction.
When do Lamens, Suzan and Jones, Emerson kick off?
Lamens, Suzan vs Jones, Emerson starts on 25 Aug 2026, 15:00 (UTC), in the WTA US Open, New York, USA.
How many bookmakers does LaserOdds compare for this match?
LaserOdds compares odds from 8 bookmakers for Lamens, Suzan vs Jones, Emerson, highlighting the best price for each outcome.
How much does the choice of bookmaker change the payout on Lamens, Suzan vs Jones, Emerson?
On Lamens, Suzan, prices across 8 bookmakers run from 2.52 to 2.77. A R$100 stake returns R$277 at Betano BR against R$252 at Superbet — a 9.9% difference for the same bet.
Where can I bet on Lamens, Suzan vs Jones, Emerson?
You can compare odds from 8 licensed bookmakers for Lamens, Suzan vs Jones, Emerson on LaserOdds and follow the link to your preferred operator. Please gamble responsibly.