The market makes Pade, Charlie the favourite at 71.0% implied probability, with Bet7k paying 1.34 — the best price of the 4 bookmakers we compare.
These are market prices, not a tip — the decision is yours.
Best available odds
What the odds imply: Pade, Charlie 71.0%, Andrews, Oscar 29.0%. Implied probability from the consensus of 4 bookmakers, with the 8.5% margin removed.
Bet7k offers the best price on Pade, Charlie to win: 1.34
Superbet offers the best price on Andrews, Oscar to win: 3.55
The gap between the best and worst price on Pade, Charlie is 8.9% — R$100 returns R$134 at Bet7k but only R$123 at Superbet.
Comparing live odds across 4 bookmakers, updated continuously.
Frequently asked questions
Which bookmaker has the best odds for Pade, Charlie vs Andrews, Oscar?
Bet7k currently offers the best price on Pade, Charlie to win at 1.34. LaserOdds compares 4 bookmakers in real time so you always see the top available price for each outcome.
What is the win probability for Pade, Charlie vs Andrews, Oscar?
Across 4 bookmakers the odds imply 71.0% for Pade, Charlie and 29.0% for Andrews, Oscar. These are probabilities implied by the prices, with the 8.5% bookmaker margin removed — not a prediction.
When do Pade, Charlie and Andrews, Oscar kick off?
Pade, Charlie vs Andrews, Oscar starts on 22 Aug 2026, 23:00 (UTC), in the UTR PTT Gold Coast Men 05, 17-20 Playoff.
How many bookmakers does LaserOdds compare for this match?
LaserOdds compares odds from 4 bookmakers for Pade, Charlie vs Andrews, Oscar, highlighting the best price for each outcome.
How much does the choice of bookmaker change the payout on Pade, Charlie vs Andrews, Oscar?
On Pade, Charlie, prices across 4 bookmakers run from 1.23 to 1.34. A R$100 stake returns R$134 at Bet7k against R$123 at Superbet — a 8.9% difference for the same bet.
Where can I bet on Pade, Charlie vs Andrews, Oscar?
You can compare odds from 4 licensed bookmakers for Pade, Charlie vs Andrews, Oscar on LaserOdds and follow the link to your preferred operator. Please gamble responsibly.